Since Obama took the Oath of Office, people have been asking to see the proof of his qualification to hold the Office.
WND has reported that a wide range of Obama documentation – along with Obama's birth certificate – are not available, including Obama's kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records. See: WND: Now White House joins 'birth hospital' cover-up
It appears now, U.S. District Judge David O. Carter, of California, who just happens to also be an ex-Marine, may have agreed to hear the case, filed by attorney Orly Taitz.
In all fairness, why were these questions NOT raised when he announced his candidacy?
The truth is, these questions WERE raised...and dismissed. Dismissed by the courts, the media and the sleeping public. One example from the past:
A prominent Philadelphia attorney and Hillary Clinton supporter filed suit this afternoon in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission. The action seeks an injunction preventing the senator from continuing his candidacy and a court order enjoining the DNC from nominating him next week, all on grounds that Sen. Obama is constitutionally ineligible to run for and hold the office of President of the United States. -- by Jeff Schreiber, America's Right, Obama Sued in Philadelphia Federal Court on Grounds he is Constitutionally Ineligible for the Presidency Thursday, Aug 21, 2008
Had the courts and the media done their jobs at the time, we would not be sitting on a powder keg today. Had the courts and the media done their jobs at any juncture along the path leading to this point, perhaps we would not be sitting on this powder keg at all!
There are people in America who care deeply for the Rule of Law, who understand the Constitution is the "tie that binds" us together as a free nation and who could care less about a candidate's bloodline as long as that candidate meets the qualifications.
Then there are the people who do not like the Rule of Law, but want the law to favor them because they feel they are at a disadvantage due to their background (status, race, birth origin, etc) or because they are at an advantage due to their backgound (status, race, birth origin, old money, etc).
And then, there are the people who just want things given to them because they feel they are entitled to it for some previous injury, real or imagined. Because they have been told they somehow deserve it, and they will vote for any one, regardless of whether the candidate qualifies or not, just so long as they believe that candidate will give them more and more.
And when their candidate is challenged, they see that as proof of their continued discrimination. They don't care that he isn't qualified, all they care about is the perceived attack on THEM as a whole. This can be a race issue or a party issue.
IF there is a court hearing to force the viewing of documentation to prove ONCE & FOR ALL, that Barrack Hussein Obama meets the qualifications set out in the Constitution for his holding the office of President of the United States of America, and IF that documentation fails to provide such proof and he is removed from office, the 3rd group of people above will never believe it was done solely because "their guy" failed to meet those qualifications. They will see this as evidence of continued discrimination against their race or their party and I predict all those people who have been arming themselves to the teeth will NEED those freshly bought protection mechanisms as there will be a "Rodney King redo" across the nation.
Be aware, be prepared, be forewarned.